Two examples of compromising influences

I listened recently to an audio of a pastor Begley interview
about CERN. The speaker used the term "architecht" to
describe God, so is obviously a mason. Now, thinking on
this, I realized "architecht" has implications. An architecht
doesn't build the building, workers do that. An architecht
merely designs the building. This designation for God
would fit the idea of angels doing the actual work of
Creation, but The Bible nowhere hints at this. It is clear
that ALL things were MADE BY GOD.

The speaker also totally confuses the ideas of antimatter
and dark matter, which are not the same. The idea of
contained anti matter once breaching containment and
beginning reaction means all other contained such start
reacting also is not sourced, neither is any other crazy
stuff.

Supposedly this "dark matter" is all chaos and when it
affects regular life it makes chaos and evil, and it is
what everything is made of and the signature of it and
of life is the same supposedly and we all have some of
it, and the New Age notion is then floated by the speaker
and Begley (a charismatic pastor) that how we think or
feel patches into either the evil that God supposedly
made everything out of, or the good which is God, and
then Begley gets into speaking things into existence
like God did and says that the difference between us
and the devil is that the devil can believe in God but
not confess Him while we CONFESS God. This is
obviously drawn from James 2:19

"Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well:
the devils also believe and tremble."

ignored of course is the following verse and overall
context:

"But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without
works is dead?"

The problem is not that the devils don't confess God
but that they don't OBEY God, or not willingly out
of obedience but backing off in fear of God's
superior power.

NOTHING ABOUT CONFESSING GOD LIKE
CONFESSING WEALTH OR HEALTH OR
WHATEVER, on the contrary, the ones who believe
in one God are confessing just fine, THEY ARE NOT
OBEYING GOD.

Notice the subtle twist of Scripture here.

The interview then goes on to get into what adds up
to magic, and a concept of reality that would have
everything linked to and derived from "the dark" and
so forth, reminds me of a concept from Tani Jantsang's
brand of satanism decades ago on alt.satanism.
Also a basic primer on magic.

The second thing is a very different book, "What Witches
Don't Want You To Know," by Mary Lake. I read it on
kindle last night.

This is mostly a really good explanation of things that
happened to her especially as she got involved in
recognizing and fighting satanism in her community. 
But she had a weak point that remained unaddressed.
Pentecostalism. Mentioned praying under her breath and
then out loud what she figured the interpretation was,
so it was tongues.

Now, the deception of tongues is hindered by a heavy
focus on and loyalty to the Bible. Experience and the
Bible taught her to get rid of some nonsense notions
like a Christian can't have a demon. (flat out possession
is probably impossible for a Christian who is focused
on Jesus Christ in his or her life and obeying God and
turning to God about everything, but that doesn't mean
deception minor influence and other attacks can't
happen. especially when doors are opened. which issue
she deals with.)

Mostly the book is good. But in the process of closing
doors and getting more obedient to God, Who was
showing her a lot of things that she got independent
confirmation on, after she turned to Him in her extreme
depression (yes, the symptoms of depression and of
psychic attack strongly overlap), she got into two
errors. One was believing Alexander Hislop who is
one of the most absurd researchers who bases some of
his statements on nothing whatsoever and who equates
every mythological figure that is similar in any way,
ignoring differences. This resulted in not observing
Christmas and birthdays.

Dec. 25 was
calculated based on the courses the priests worked
and John the Baptist being 6 months older than
Jesus, and what course his father worked. Also
figuring in date selection was HAnnukkah not a
Mosaic Law celebration.

http://www.sabbath.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Library.sr/CT/ARTB/k/568/When-Was-Jesus-Born.htm This argues Jesus was born
Sept. 11, which of course puts His conception in mid
to late December. A matter ignored by the writer.

Now the next thing she gets into is reviving Mosaic
food laws. Having felt "conviction" out of the blue
when eating bacon sandwich and other times she
starts getting into the Leviticus food laws, and dismisses
the vision to Peter, and notes that Jesus came to fulfill
not end the Law.

Trouble with that one is that having fulfilled it the LAw
then ends, for Jesus said not a jot or tittle would pass
until it was all fulfilled. And since He fulfilled it, He
ended it, because it would pass once fulfilled.

(and "the Law" isn't just the rules it is the whole Torah incl.
prophecies in it about the Messiah, such as that He
would come when a non Judaean would be on the
throne of Judah, Genesis 49:10)

Hebrews 7:12 "For the priesthood being changed, there
is made of necessity a change also of the law." and goes
on to point out that Jesus Christ, a priest forever after
the order (meaning "manner") of Melchizedec, is not
of the tribe of Aaron so cannot be a priest under the Mosaic
LAw.

Finally, the Apostolic Council in Acts chapter 15
specified that nothing would be kept from the Mosaic
Law that was originally required to keep one on track
with God through externals, only don't fornicate,
don't murder, don't eat things sacrificed to idols and
don't eat things strangled (no exsanguination at all).
This don't eat blood or at least pour some out during
death of the animal goes back to Noah, not Moses.

That and Paul's reiterations against Mosaic ritual law,
incl. Sabbath keeping, should have settled it.

I think that because she keeps the tongues talking, and
frequents the charismatic scene, she has something else
piggybacking. she is too loyal to God and too inclined
to the Bible for it to take over, but it can give deception
and this is what has happened.

Of interest is that she notes that the people she was
fighting in Missouri were such as a KKK person who
was friends with a homosexual, and "the whole scenario
resembled a boiling brew of different pagan sects with a
particular emphasis on Druidism." Two critical towns
were Dixon Mo and Fort Leonard Wood Mo.

Some years ago I was told of just such a group networked
across the country which had exactly such a peculiar mix,
and those two towns were confirmed when I asked about
it. "Traditional Druidism" is what its called now I think.

So her family dumped Christmas and Easter and birthdays
and went for the Mosaic holy days with Christian focus.
The purpose being to break free of any links through
shared time of celebrations, this did her some good. So did
the food thing apparently, BUT BEING TOO SLACK
BECAUSE OF THINKING ONE IS SAFE DURING A
HOLY TIME OF YEAR WOULD BE THE REAL PROBLEM,
AND PORK BEING THE SAME TASTE AS HUMAN FLESH,
IT IS HIGHLY LIKELY THAT THIS IS IN  USE AS A
SUBSTITUTE WHEN THE REAL THING CAN'T BE HAD.

Given her own background of ritual abuse and attempts to
train her for something, it is possible she had eaten human
flesh, and this was the real origin of the "conviction" when
eating bacon. Subconscious recognition. God may have allowed
these semi heretic developments because they did distance her
from a compromised situation.

But if she had not been Pentecostal, I think she would not
have been blinded to the plain word of God, that the food laws
are not to be followed. A closer examination of herself would
have shown that ONLY pork got this "conviction" sense not
the other prohibited foods like shellfish, which were only
dumped after research in Leviticus. And this might have led to
digging up more memories and information that might have
been of use to her.

how to argue with a new ager, common core promoter and/or sustainable growth advocate

here is an argument to try to weaken a new ager's stance and anyone's determination in all this.

the educational system in play [common core but this applies to other stuff as well] came (under a similar name) from that guy Muller who channeled it
from some entity.
The whole New Age thing is about changing your consciousness and sooner or later we get to hear
about spiritual beings without bodies.

now, the question to ask them is, is this really a good idea? (we know it isn't but they don't.)

fitting us to deal with life on the terms of admittedly nonhuman beings, who are radically different
from us, means forcing us into a mold we were not designed (or evolved) to be in. If this were our
next step in evolution, it would happen on its own, not be forced like this. It doesn't seem to really be
useful for physical survival and dealing with objective reality, something that is an issue in
human survival, so what good is it?
If this is to prepare us for life after death, we can learn all that when we die.
Suiting us for living non physically with a different than normal physical brain state, is
ipso facto not suiting us for living
in the world we have to live in.

So everything about this is dysfunctional from the word go.

And if nature (or rather God) did not design these different types of beings to be together on the
non humans' terms if at all, then it is highly dubious to cultivate
such beings or the states of mind
that allegedly typify them.

(someone will scream "these are demons!" YES I KNOW THAT, BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT HOW TO UNDERMINE
THE WORLDVIEW OF THE NEW AGER,
AND DISENCHANT THE NOT FULLY COMMITTED POTENTIAL RECRUIT OR SEMI RECRUIT TO NEW AGEISM.)

these beings are then an invasive species. And consider, if PETA can argue that humans should
eventually have no contact with animals at all, then why should we have contact with nonhumans or they have contact with us?
it is inappropriate.

could pre trib rapture doctrine set you up for a fake rapture?

http://politicallyunclassifiable.blogspot.com/2015/04/could-pre-trib-rapture-doctrine-set.html

evolution and quantum physics

Every peculiar thing in science gets hijacked by occultism.
Now days it is quantum this and that. In the old days (1700s
to mid 1900s) it was magnetism and electricity.
Evolution always plays a big role in occult philosophy.

I am not going to get into the technical problems of the
theory of evolution, and they exist. problems with the
presuppositions of radiometric dating and how different
systems give different results from the same thing, or
a live clam is dated as two million years old.

Occult philosophy wants to take you to some supposed
next level of evolution. The fact is, that even Darwinian
evolution (and all versions of evolution) state that some
evolutionary directions dead end, and some are in fact
degenerate and DE-volve rather than E-volve.

This is never stated by evolutionary mystics, unless
discussing racial issues. The next level racial development
is explicitly considered to be what will replace the previous
or current race, either by the latter's demise of their own
fault, or by genocide.

The phenomenon of parasitism is also ignored in all this.

So how do you know some entities that seem all glowing
and peaceful aren't parasites who want to evolve you into
a spiritual and physical (eventually) dead end that is of
use only to their interests as slaves and food for them,
which might indeed for a while involve you feeling better
and being healthier just as a farmer wants to keep his
livestock healthy for slaughter later?

you don't know.

so best not to listen to them.

All "change" is assumed in the minds of the buzzword
thinkers to be "positive" or good. All "evolution" is
supposedly in the upward or better direction.

But is it? Cancer is a good example of "change," isn't it?

The evolutionary charts of the more complex sorts are
full of examples of species that supposedly degenerated
and died out.

Evolution by its own account of itself is not always for
the better. The huge dinosaurs probably superficially look
better than the smaller more vulnerable versions and
certainly more impressive. But where are they now?

Evolution and mysticism were at the basis of Nazi philosophy.
And for those of you who think only Jews were a target of
elimination to make room for the superior race, guess again.
"Racial hygiene" or "eugenic fitness" or some less problematic
sounding phrase targets the weak and sick among the so called
superior race. Nazis started by killing the "inferior" among
Aryans, and went on to kill Jews and OTHERS and had plans
for the slavs and blacks. Oh, yeah, after they got done
co-opting Christianity as much as they could, they were going
to eliminate us Christians too, that would take longer but the
goal was to install Germanic paganism eventually as the
official state religion. Hitler once expressed the opinion that
it was too bad the Germans and Europeans became Christian,
because islam with its warrior qualities was far more
suitable a religion. Maybe that has something to do with why
satanist David Myatt of the Order of Nine Angles in Britain
converted to islam.

anything written by or involved in by these people should be viewed with caution

http://www.katinkahesselink.net/his/influence-theosophy.html

What color is your aura supposed to be?

well, leaving out the issue of whether most who claim to see
auras can do so, and are not just being subjective and self
deceived, and viewing an aura they hallucinate in response
to what they sense about the person anyway,

and leaving out the issue of fraud and calculation and saying
what supposedly it would like if it fit what they figured by
a "cold reading" anyway,

and leaving out the SERIOUS issue of confusing the color
of one's own aura with that of another, whose aura you are
looking at THROUGH YOUR OWN,

lets look at the issue itself.

Confusing everything from the get go is the hindu and Tibetan
and tantric Buddhist based information that links various false
gods and yantra symbols and colors to each one.

In general, if you don't see auras that much, if at all, but are
overwhelmed to it being almost visible, by a sense rather than
a full visual picture of some color about a person, you might
want to sit up and take notice. Most likely dirty brown and dark
colors and black are a bad sign. Red can mean powered up
logically, either in pain or in anger or whatever.

But the thing that has always bugged me most, is the notion
that a golden aura is a sign of superior spirituality. What kind
of spirituality are we talking about here? Even one writer on
it warned that it could become an unwholesome brassy color.
Eastern Orthodox monastics with some experience, say that
a brassy gold with red flecks present is an indication the
devil is involved. My own experience, before I knew anything
about this, was that everyone who had a gold yellow aura
impression about them, had a demonic influence, were to
some degree involved with demons. The only exception were
those with whom I had no conversation or knew nothing
about.

I also noticed this on someone I didn't get to talk with about
this, but he was an old guy who had been in the Flying Tigers
in WW 2 and the subject of the brothel kept for them came up
and he looked back on that with nostalgia and he turned that
color. THIS IS CLEARLY TO DO WITH EVIL. And even if
not directly demonic in all cases, it is something damn bad,
whether prostitute client or demon familiar linked.

I saw this sometimes a little in connection with some stuff I
later figured out was evil, along with a kind of smile and
narrowing of the eyes.

In general, particulate impression is bad also. Whatever
color, if it is demonic it will be like a mass of particles not
a solid impression, and the latter isn't absent from some
evil either.

At this point I am talking about the color in the atmosphere
the saturation of a place an object or something pouring
into a house or room from somewhere. Blue is anti demon
to a great extent, and is rarely used by them. A very dark
nasty midnight blue is likely evil and muddy grey blues
even though sometimes used as part of the haint blue anti
demon technology so to speak, are probably not good.

In my experience, living in a raunchy hotel, and doing
cleaning in someone's house a few times, a kind of
particulate or streaky white light can be present when
there is cocaine in the systems of the people generating
the influence and saturating the environment.

What does true light do? It makes visible. It doesn't blind
you (though the sun if you were to look straight at it
would be blinding) it doesn't make a fog you can't see in
(aside from the occasional divine miracle of fogs that
interfered with those attacking those praying for help
in Russia and in Anatolia/Byzantium many many
centuries ago), it lets you see more clearly when it is
present.

The RC iconography doesn't help. Highly naturalistic
figures are given a naturalistic looking not artificial and
symbolic looking aura. (maybe some of these artists
had the wrong ideas and spiritual associations anyway,
there is a lot of interesting dirt on popes and artists who
set trends in the Renaissance.) These are golden to pale
and in general look like what you DON'T want to run
into.

The Orthodox iconography is, well, cruder. The halos
are obviously symbolic and not something that seems
to tell you what to expect to see if Jesus or a saint were
to appear, or on a remarkably holy Christian. So this
is safer. Colors have specific symbolic meaning about
suffering, heaven, etc. They are not realistic, so less
likely to create confusion.

It took me a while to figure this out. It was odd to me
that someone could be part of a group of drunks and
have this look from across a street and park. That
someone else who was a heroin user and immediately
engaged in an act of economic deception on a sexist
pretense could seem to have some peaceful nice vibe
and a bit of this white light look.

I finally figured it out, this crap is of the devil. At best,
the effect on the electrical system of generating a self
deceptive or other deceptive fog.

Now lets look at Ecclesiastes chapter 12. People who
never heard of a sheep and knew nothing about
shepherding would not understand anything in the Bible
about it, unless they heard from or read something
written by someone who did. Same with this.

"Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth, while
the evil days come not,....
"Or ever the silver cord [links soul and spirit to body,
reported by many bilocators and some near deah
experiencers] be loosed, OR THE GOLDEN BOWL BE
BROKEN,"

stop a minute. Golden bowl? this still puzzled me once
I knew what gold implied. But recently by the grace of
God, I figured out that the writer is addressing someone
who has forgotten his Creator, and is living after the
flesh, misled by seducing spirits he may not even know
he has with him. After all, doesn't the writer say,
"Remember now thy Creator in the days of thy youth"?
why say this to someone who has not forgotten his
Creator?

The person being addressed has the wrong fleshly-
demonic aura and feels good as is often the case a false
peace, a false pleasure, and the writer is reminding him
to turn to YHWH his Creator and stop getting high on
whatever drugs or state of mind.

"Or the pitcher be broken at the fountain,"
this is still a bit puzzling, perhaps this refers to the
physical side of the death process, the internal breakdown
beginning, or perhaps to a layer of aura that is strictly
about the life supporting electrical system of the body.

"or the wheel be broken at the cistern."
The word chakra is Sanskrit for wheel. The reason chakras
or wheels are given this name, is because the resemble
wheels, rotating or still, vortices. Exactly how these came
to be known is anyone's guess, probably some who had
the unusual ability, perhaps also while out of their bodies,
may have been able to observe these. Perhaps the writer
of Ecclesiastes had this ability, perhaps the addressee
had this ability and was proud of his misuse of ability.

Both of these, the pitcher at the fountain and the wheel
at the cistern, seem to be involved in getting or managing
life processes for fountains and cisterns relate to water
which relates to life. the pitcher seems to be some function
that would draw from a fountain which is probably fed
by the wheel which draws from some cistern or holder
or collector of life.

Do I have any readers?

Please speak up. Lets get to work on doing something constructive.
While you may not want face to face conflict with New Agers and
One World Order types, there is a lot that can be done online. There
are both Christian and secular arguments to use against them. The
presence of Christians among the NWO and using New Age practices
doesn't change the nature of all this, only means they are deceived.