how to argue with a new ager, common core promoter and/or sustainable growth advocate

here is an argument to try to weaken a new ager's stance and anyone's determination in all this.

the educational system in play [common core but this applies to other stuff as well] came (under a similar name) from that guy Muller who channeled it
from some entity.
The whole New Age thing is about changing your consciousness and sooner or later we get to hear
about spiritual beings without bodies.

now, the question to ask them is, is this really a good idea? (we know it isn't but they don't.)

fitting us to deal with life on the terms of admittedly nonhuman beings, who are radically different
from us, means forcing us into a mold we were not designed (or evolved) to be in. If this were our
next step in evolution, it would happen on its own, not be forced like this. It doesn't seem to really be
useful for physical survival and dealing with objective reality, something that is an issue in
human survival, so what good is it?
If this is to prepare us for life after death, we can learn all that when we die.
Suiting us for living non physically with a different than normal physical brain state, is
ipso facto not suiting us for living
in the world we have to live in.

So everything about this is dysfunctional from the word go.

And if nature (or rather God) did not design these different types of beings to be together on the
non humans' terms if at all, then it is highly dubious to cultivate
such beings or the states of mind
that allegedly typify them.

(someone will scream "these are demons!" YES I KNOW THAT, BUT I AM TALKING ABOUT HOW TO UNDERMINE
THE WORLDVIEW OF THE NEW AGER,
AND DISENCHANT THE NOT FULLY COMMITTED POTENTIAL RECRUIT OR SEMI RECRUIT TO NEW AGEISM.)

these beings are then an invasive species. And consider, if PETA can argue that humans should
eventually have no contact with animals at all, then why should we have contact with nonhumans or they have contact with us?
it is inappropriate.