Monday, January 25, 2016

overview breaking non sequiturs in new age talk

as usual, I get on these subjects on Constance Cumbey's blog because someone ELSE brings them
up part of some snipe at me. The one who started it used the phrase "seered conscience" this
person can't spell its spelled seared with an A.

so here is what I wrote, for the benefit of anyone here.
Biblehub commentary ecclesiastes 12:6 makes occultist statements
to prove Hebrew galgal a whirling round thing in the body that breaks down at death

is NOT the same as Sanskrit chakra wheel a whirling round thing in the body that breaks down at death. you propose to refute my supposed occultism with concepts themselves held by occultists, new agers, mystics:
"The cord is what we should call the thread of life, on which hangs the body lit by the animating soul; when the connection between these is severed, the latter perishes, like a fallen lamp lying crushed on the ground. In this our view the cord is the living power which keeps the corporeal substance from failing to ruin; the bowl is the body itself thus upheld."

"THE THREAD OF LIFE,...THE BODY LIT BY THE ANIMATING SOUL;...THE LIVING POWER WHICH KEEPS THE CORPOREAL SUBSTANCE FROM FALLING TO RUIN."

any new ager would agree to these things. mystical nonsense is what modern medicine calls it. I would have to agree the soul animates the body, and the astral or silver cord seen by the bilocator is the connection and if it snaps and isn't restored the person's body dies. If the soul gets back into the body in time the life can be recovered, one person tripping out too far got a bad scare could barely get back.

NOTE TO MYSTICS: SUBTLE ENERGIES ARE NOT DIVINE ANY MORE THAN SEMI DIGESTED FOOD SLOP IN YOUR STOMACH IS DIVINE. JUST A SUBTLE MATERIAL THING. tweak them you can get high. aka intoxicated. that word means poisoned, notice "toxic" n "intoxicated." like taking drugs. you can wreck your sense of reality dangerously
with mysticism. and sometimes "subtle energies" are demons or field effects of demons disguised as subtle energies. CHAKRAS/GALGALIM SHOULD NEVER BE OPENED.

 
re: "repenting of...your claims...[Eccl. 12:6] refers to the chakra, and knowledge that chakras are a doctrine of devils!" would prevent psychic attack - no it wouldn't. believing subtle galgal exist does not open one to psychic attack, manipulating galgal might. LOOKS LIKE YOU FLUNK SPIRITUAL WARFARE 101 TOO.

They can functions as demonic doorways. they should NEVER be opened. some may be artificial instead of inherent. your brain can be a demonic doorway if misused also, that doesn't prove that believing the brain exists is bad.

astral projection DOES NOT PROVE reincarnation, merely that something exists aside from the body and would continue after death, same as Bible says, duh.

nibiru Planet X (now Planet 9) DOES NOT SUPPORT ANNUNAKI, ALIENS CREATING US, SITCHIN LIES ABOUT NONEXISTENT TABLETS AND MISTRANSLATIONS OF SUMERIAN OR ANYTHING ELSE, NOR DOES IT EXPLAIN THE FLOOD OR EXODUS DISASTERS LOCALIZED TO EGYPT. Planet X as in 10 was noted by Harrington in the early 1980s to pull DOWN on Neptune and Uranus, so orbits below and above never through the ecliptic. Not that big a deal.

aliens IF physical DO NOT SUPPORT A SINGLE THING THEY ARE USED TO SUPPORT.
“This praying mantis creature's civilization communicates difficult concepts
via the use of symbols that radiate emotion. ...The emotional aspect is relayed
via carrier waves that resemble sound waves, but are not part of the human
sound spectrum. These waves can be felt, but not heard.” - Linda Porter, Human Abductee, 1963, Covina, California SOUNDS LIKE LOCUTIONS TO ME. could also be infrasound.

non sequiturs.

chakras/galgalim DO NOT SUPPORT NEW AGE AND ARE NOT "DOCTRINE" BUT SUBTLE ANATOMY. they have no bearing on any doctrine they are manipulated in relation to.

http://news.yahoo.com/ninth-planet-may-exist-solar-system-us-scientists-174753045.html;_ylt=AwrSbmqRJ6BWbT8Atjal87UF;_ylu=X3oDMTEybGlqdjVyBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDQjExNTlfMQRzZWMDc2M- This is the old Nemesis theory. more support for it.

No comments:

Post a Comment